Part 2: What’s At Stake With the Proposed CDC Rulemaking That Has An Open Comment Period Until October 14, 2016?
This is Edition No. 2 of “What’s at stake with the proposed CDC Rulemaking” in which I want to prompt readers that the comment period for the totally outrageous ‘rules’ the CDC has published in the Federal Register for U.S. citizens and immigrants regarding health and its care; forced healthcare; forced vaccinations; and quarantines, etc. expires Friday, October 14, 2016.
Have you filed your comment?
To understand what’s at stake, I discuss along with Dr Rima Laibow, MD, Medical Director of the Natural Solutions Foundation, Ralph Fucetola, JD, Legal Counsel for the NSF, and Larry Becraft, Esq., attorney extraordinaire in such matters, the power-grab the CDC is going after—a “dragnet”, in essence, rulemaking—in this 34-minute video that you, hopefully, will listen to in order to understand why you need to file your comment.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWCTLG7QusI]
https://youtu.be/rWCTLG7QusI
Furthermore, consider this taken from the published rulemaking:
CDC may enter into an agreement with an individual, upon such terms as the CDC considers to be reasonably necessary, indicating that the individual consents to any of the public health measures authorized under this part, including quarantine, isolation, conditional release, medical examination, hospitalization, vaccination, and treatment: provided that the individual’s consent shall not be considered as a prerequisite to any exercise of any authority under this part. [CJF emphasis added]
Dr Rima Laibow, MD, asks these questions, which you ought to consider seriously:
WHAT IF THE GOVERNMENT:
googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1470694951173-5'); });
//tags-cdn.deployads.com/a/activistpost.com.js
(deployads = window.deployads || ).push({});