Susanne Posel, Contributor
Activist Post

In the effort of the global Elite to rewire human DNA and alter the very structure of our genome, vaccines designed to alter our brain functions have emerged into the mainstream medical community.

The transhumanist agenda seeks to:

• Control who has the right to life through the application of eugenics.


• Control reproduction of the general population with sterilization campaigns, contraception and abortion.


• Identify disabilities that can be “enhanced” with implants, prosthetics, RFID chips genetic engineering and modifications.


• Scientific-based experimentation into life-extension therapies.


• Rewiring of the brain with pharmaceuticals, psychoactive drugs and RFID chips.

Organizations like Humanity+ seeks “the continuation and acceleration of the evolution of intelligent life beyond its currently human form and human limitations by means of science and technology, guided by life-promoting principles and values.”

They are “an international nonprofit membership organization which advocates the ethical use of technology to expand human capacities.”

In their Transhumanist Declaration, they outline their agenda to:

• Use technology to “broaden human potential” by overcoming aging and “cognitive shortcomings.”


• Provide forums where globalist scientist and researchers can “deliberate how [to enhance humanity through science] to expedite beneficial applications.”


• Facilitate “social order, improve human foresight and wisdom” through genetic enhancement.


• Influence policymakers to include the transhumanist “responsible and moral vision.”

Through funding research and development, they move toward improving on humanity intellectually and culturally by utilizing technology to enhance cognitive and physical capacities. In a post-human world, when science has enhanced humanity, intelligence will be enhanced by augmentations to the biological human.

One way to usher in the era of Transhumanity is to curb addictions such as smoking. Globalist scientists like Dr. Kim D. Janda, professor at the Scripps Research Institute, believes that immunizations against nicotine addiction is “an alternative or better way for some people” as a “system to get people off the drugs.”

Janda’s vaccines cause the immune system to produce antibodies that control the brain’s response to narcotics prior to the onset of addiction. This is based on the hypothesis that addiction causes physical changes in the brain and has spurred medical advocacy for solving America’s drug problems with immunizations.

The “scientific principle” is “simplistically stupid” according to Janda. Vaccines introduce a foreign substance into the blood that coerces the immune system to develop antibodies; however, molecules like cocaine, nicotine and methamphetamine are smaller than disease molecules.

This means that the immune system ignores them. To ensure the vaccine affects the immune system, a chemical cocktail is used to coerce the production of antibodies. Smugly, Janda claims that this process does not “mess with brain chemistry.”

However Janda says that the vaccine works by “blocking the pleasure centers in the brain” that respond to either the synthetic or actual drug, i.e. nicotine. “These vaccines would be very useful for those weak moments.”

In 2011, Janda’s team successfully produced a vaccine that would blunt the effects of heroin on the brains of rats. However, when introduced in human trials, Janda’s vaccine was no more effective than placebo in forcing people to quit smoking. And even still the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Janda’s vaccines for use on the general public.

Janda admits that “the big problem plaguing these vaccines right now is difficulty predicting in humans how well it’s going to work.”

The human immune system is extremely complex, which is why animals testing yields incredible results; their genetic constitution is less intricate.

Scientists find that by adding proteins and chemicals to molecules to induce antibody production, they obtain a desired result. Based on addiction as a biological disorder, a vaccine would be a plausible answer.

Dr. Thomas Kosten, former researcher at Yale School of Medicine, conducted a study that focused on cocaine abusers and developing a vaccine to control pleasure center in the brain; much like Janda’s work.

The experiments conducted by Kosten yielded surprising results; over half of the participants in the study reduced their cocaine use after 24 weeks. Kosten was less than thrilled with the facts behind his findings:

The vaccine doesn’t get you new friends, change your depression, get you out of jail, or all the other things that people have trouble with. People could conceivably be on it for the rest of their life if they can’t get it together.

Dr. Chris Lowry with Bristol University began experimenting with a mycobacterium vaccae (M. vaccae), a treatment for lung cancer because some patients displayed improvement in mental health and cognitive function. Lowry concluded that the injection triggered as increase in serotonin.

Research mice became less stressed because, Lowry supposed M. vaccae, a molecular neurotransmitter caused a rise in the level of cytokines which boosts the immune system and subsequently effects brain function.

In this context, a vaccine could be used to treat clinical depression. And while levels of depressive disorders become more prevalent, the urge to vaccinate the public as a proactive measure would fall under the hygiene hypothesis; which asserts that childhood exposure to harmless bugs leads to improperly primed immune systems.

Under this justification, a vaccine for depression could be added to the schedule of immunizations children receive at their pediatrician’s office before the age of two.

Avoiding The Eye - Ships Free Today!

The human immune system, when allowed to properly develop, is classified as antigen-specific and has adapted to the infectious challenges in the natural world for millions of years without the aid of synthetic medications and immunizations to “aid” in immunity.

Vaccines replace natural immunity and alter brain function. The assault on children, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says that 60 vaccines must be administered before the age of 6. The majority of these vaccines contain exorbitant amounts of aluminum that inhibit the brain’s ability to develop and ultimately function properly.

Other dangerous and inherently toxic adjuvants in vaccines include: aluminum, mineral oil, detergent stabilized squalene-in-water, pertactin, formaldehyde, viral DNA, phosphate.

Yet, globalists are not satisfied with simply altering brain functions to control undesirable behavior in the general public. They are actively seeking through scientific technologies to prevent drug abusers from using illegal substances by inhibiting the receptors in the brain that cause pleasure. But they have not changed the cause of the problem, which is the state of despair from economic destruction, poor living conditions and constant stress of being exposed to multiple levels of the Delphi Technique as a societal regulator.

The continued experimentation on the world’s populations by the pharmaceutical corporations are furthering the Transhumanist agenda. With an endless supply of scientists at the globalist universities, and average citizens willing to answer their problems with the latest drug prescribed by their doctor or psychologist, there will be no end to the trial and error.

We have become the willing guinea pigs of the global Elite.

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.

You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE

var linkwithin_site_id = 557381;

linkwithin_text=’Related Articles:’

Dees Illustration

Justin Gross, Contributor
Activist Post

All of the new vaccines are DNA vaccines which contaminate normal human DNA with patented GMOs, just as Monsanto has been doing to organic fields with pollen drift.

The public has not been informed of this or given legal papers to release their intellectual property rights over their own unique DNA.

But under GW Bush, whose family is deeply connected to the biotech/pharmaceutical industry that put Hitler into office, laws were put in place that would use the military to force such vaccines, and with unknown content, on the entire population, under the pretext of a flu.

The following went into effect under George Bush:

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION checklist for influenza pandemic preparedness planning: Section 1.5.1 Legal and ethical issues –

‘During a pandemic, it may be necessary to overrule existing legislation or (individual) human rights. Examples are the enforcement of quarantine (overruling individual freedom of movement), use of privately owned buildings for hospitals, off-license use of drugs, compulsory vaccination or implementation of emergency shifts in essential services. These decisions need a legal framework to ensure transparent assessment and justification of the measures that are being considered, and to ensure coherence with international legislation (International Health Regulations). [Source]

Bush provided the pandemics laws that intersect with the WHO’s health regulations. Obama recently signed an executive order putting the US into alignment with international laws. The WHO has been the driver of covert sterilizing campaigns with vaccines around the world, and just threatened Pakistan for attempting to suspend Gates, WHO, and World Bank polio vaccines until the Pakistani government was sure the vaccines were safe and effective. The vaccines are causing mass paralysis there.

George Bush pushed through the pandemic laws in the US using the false fear that there would again be a pandemic like the 1918 flu pandemic. There was no flu pandemic in 1918. Millions died but they died because of the pharmaceutical industry’s “miracle drug,” aspirin, a highly toxic drug that can kill quickly when used in overdose, as well as a potent immunosuppressive which allowed common upper respiratory infections to deteriorate into deadly pneumonias. The millions of 1918-19 deaths are the result of pharmaceutical industry greed, and the collusion of government, medical authorities, military and corporations.

These same groups have gone many steps further under the Bush pandemic laws.

• They have mandated a highly toxic, immunosuppressive “treatment” in advance, to every person in the country.


• They have brought together government, military, medical “authorities,” and corporations in a financial arrangement.


• All liability has been removed.


• The vaccines themselves do not have to be tested (and thus not even known) in an emergency.


• Any emergency does not have to be proved.

The last is how the CDC was able to create the impression of an H1N1 pandemic with exaggerated data. The CDC attempted to block the CBS investigation.

When the false data was exposed by CBS, Obama put the country under a (false) emergency, but an emergency which activated FEMA and removed all requirements to test vaccines used for “an emergency.”

CDC was complicit in the pandemic laws, which are martial law mandating untested, unknown vaccines for the country, for any emergency the CDC can invent and then declare.

And the Pentagon has just taken over the flu vaccine.

American Natural Superfood - Free Sample

Is The ACLU aware that Sebelius and HHS, which has censored vaccine concerns, have been producing a ‘Fertility Impairing Vaccine‘?

Any vaccine of this kind used against the public without its legal release, constitutes a deceptive trade practice at best. But without question to use the military is to force patented intellectual property of unknown design (potentially to sterilize them, potentially to kill them) onto people who have no information or means to refuse.

By what rights does the Pentagon act on behalf of the biotech industry to inject their patented intellectual property into human beings without their signed release of their own intellectual property in the form of their unique DNA?

To resist mandatory vaccinations, petition HERE

You can support this information by voting on Reddit HERE

var linkwithin_site_id = 557381;

linkwithin_text=’Related Articles:’

In earlier times it was easier to control a million people than physically to kill a million people. Today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people then to control a million people. – Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, Carter/Obama Advisor).

Paul Adams, J.D.
Activist Post

Research and studies demonstrate that Genetically Modified (GM) foods potentially serve two purposes, neither of which is to feed the starving masses or increase crop yield on a long-term basis. Instead, the purposes of GM foods appear to be those of a bad science-fiction nightmare:

1. Reduce the human population by poisoning the food supply, causing increases in cancer, inflammation, disease, organ failure and premature death. At the same time, using food to covertly render the population infertile.


2. Give a handful of elites and the companies they control complete control over the world’s food supply.

As Henry Kissinger said, “If you control the oil you control the country; if you control the food, you control the population.” Joseph Stalin agreed and is infamous for starving millions of people to death and submission.

With their accomplices at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and within governments, a few corporate giants and their major investors are responsible for much of the damage, destruction, and injuries caused by GM foods.

Monsanto and Dow Chemical manufacture GM seeds and toxic herbicides such as Roundup (Glyphosate). These two corporations also produced Agent Orange herbicide. Vietnam estimates 400,000 people were killed or maimed, and 500,000 children born with birth defects as a result of Agent Orange. The Red Cross of Viet Nam estimates that up to 1 million people are disabled or have health problems due to Agent Orange.

Dow Chemical was also the manufacturer of Napalm, which was used to burn the skin off children like Phan Thi Kim Phuc.

Why are these corporate criminals being allowed to take over the world’s food supply? Money and corruption would be the obvious answers, but after reviewing the evidence objectively and without cognitive dissonance, depopulation and control over the world’s food supply prove more likely.

Studies Prove GM Foods and Roundup Lethal

The recent and long-term French study from the University of Caen found that eating genetically modified corn and consuming trace levels of Monsanto’s Roundup chemical fertilizer caused rats to develop horrifying tumors, widespread organ damage, and premature death. This study has been deemed “the most thorough research ever published into the health effects of GM food crops and the herbicide Roundup on rats.”

The study found:

• Up to 50% of males and 70% of females suffered premature death.
  


• Rats that drank trace amounts of Roundup (at levels legally allowed in the water supply) had a 200% to 300% increase in large tumors.
  


• Rats fed GM corn and traces of Roundup suffered severe organ damage including liver damage and kidney damage.


• The study fed these rats NK603, the Monsanto variety of GM corn that’s grown across North America and widely fed to animals and humans. This is the same corn that’s in your corn-based breakfast cereal, corn tortillas and corn snack chips.

The study caused Russia to ban imports of U.S. GM corn due to the cancer risk. France and most of Europe have effectively banned feeding GM crops to humans and Monsanto was found guilty of ‘chemical poisoning’ earlier this year.

In the Unites States, one in two men and one in three women get cancer. What role does GM corn and soy play, which are common in most processed foods?

Walmart sells GM corn to its customers without labeling it as such.

Russian biologist Alexey V. Surov, and his colleagues were determined to discover if Monsanto’s genetically modified soy, grown on 91% of US soybean fields, leads to problems in growth or reproduction.

They found that after feeding hamsters for two years over three generations, those on the GM diet, and especially the group on the maximum GM soy diet, showed devastating results. By the third generation, most GM soy-fed hamsters lost the ability to have babies. They also suffered slower growth, and a high mortality rate among the pups.

Scientific studies have linked Monsanto’s GM corn to organ failure.

Other studies have linked GM foods to cancer. Monsanto’s GM-derived rBGH (which is a genetically-altered growth hormone given to dairy cows to make them more milk) was shown to increase the production of IGF-1 from 70-1000%. IGF-1 is a very powerful hormone that has been linked to a 2.5-4 times higher incidence of human colon, breast and prostate cancer.

Even Monsanto’s employees refuse to eat GM foods.

As the Health Ranger opined, GM foods appear to be the new Thalidomide, that morning sickness drug from the late 1950s that was quickly recalled for its deadly side effects.

It must also be noted that world famous researchers that expose the dangers of GM foods are routinely threatened, fired, ostracized and their findings denied by questionable “experts” with conflicts of interest. Studies proving GM food health risks are also routinely rejected by bought-and-paid-for government officials.

For many years Jeffrey Smith has been exposing the dangers of GM foods combined with government corruption. Much of his research can be viewed at the Institute for Responsible Technology.

GMO Corruption and Conflicts of Interest

Why are foods that contain GM ingredients allowed to be sold in the U.S. and Canada without a warning or disclaimer? Corruption.

The global elite and their political puppets tell the public that toxic GM food is safe while they themselves are obsessed with eating only organic foods. It is well known that the Clintons, Bush family, Romney family and Obamas try to eat only organic foods.

Dozens of FDA scientists warned that GM crops were dangerous and different from traditional crops only to be disregarded by their superiors such as Michael Taylor at the FDA.

Michael Taylor was an attorney at King & Spalding that started working for Monsanto in 1981. In 1991 he filled the newly created post of Deputy Commissioner for Policy at the FDA. During that time, he signed the Federal Register notice stating that milk from cows treated with Bovine Growth Hormone (BGH) did not have to be labeled as such. Between 1996 and 2000, after briefly returning to King & Spalding, he then returned to Monsanto to become Vice President for Public Policy. In June of 2000 he joined the think tank Resources for the Future in the position of Senior Fellow and Director of RFF’s Center for Risk Management, where he published two documents on U.S. aid for African agriculture, both of which were funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, known for financing Nazi eugenics. In 2009 Taylor returned to government as Senior Advisor to the FDA Commissioner and on in 2010 was appointed to FDA Deputy Commissioner for Foods. In other words, the fox is guarding the chickens.

Dozens of high ranking government officials, including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, have ties with Monsanto. However, it could be argued that Barack Obama may be Monsanto’s number one lobbyist because he filled many key USDA and FDA posts with Monsanto minions.

But don’t expect the other side of the false left vs. right divide and conquer paradigm to save you; Mitt Romney is also a Monsanto stooge:

The Nation’s investigative report has uncovered how Mitt Romney personally helped Monsanto shed its string of toxic chemical-related scandals and reinvent itself to dominate American agriculture. Monsanto, an early Bain & Company client, was so impressed with Romney that they started bypassing his superiors to deal with him directly. Romney’s close relationship with then CEO John Hanley prompted his boss to create Bain Capital to keep Romney from leaving and taking their largest consulting client with him.

Whole Foods has been caught in a scandal because its employees are trained to tell customers the grocery chain sells only organic foods. In fact, Whole Foods also sells toxic GM foods.

Whole Foods co-founder and CEO John Mackey donated to Mitt Romney, who helped promote Monsanto’s entry into biotechnology, while co-CEO Walter Robb donated to Barack Obama, who has appointed numerous Monsanto lobbyists to his administration, as well as Christie Vilsack, the wife of USDA chief Tom Vilsack, who as an Iowan politician, has bent over backward for biotech, GMOs, cloning and even the open-air growing of pharmaceutical crops.

The GM food issue has once again revealed that the mainstream media is a corporate whore easily purchased by the ugliest and most degenerate Johns. “In recent editorials, nine more California newspapers joined the growing list of publications urging voters to oppose Proposition 37 [requiring that GM foods be labeled as such) on the November ballot.” At least 29 mindless and corrupt newspapers endorse voting no on Proposition 37.

Unfortunately, Matt Drudge, the undisputed king of online news with his Drudge Report, has accepted advertising from the vote no on Proposition 37 campaign and features such ads regularly. Therefore Drudge, just like the corporate whore media oligarchy, has revealed himself as a modern day Judas Iscariot who sold-out his family, country and humanity to a group of psychopathic eugenicists hell-bent on poisoning the food supply in their Malthusian quest to reduce the population.

The Depopulation Agenda

It is no longer a secret that the global elites’ endgame is to reduce the human population by 80-95 percent. They even build monuments like the Georgia Guidestones stating such. What better way could there be than to poison the food supply without people knowing it? Profit and depopulation.

Prominent university Professors such as Eric Pianka and Richard Cardullo openly crave depopulation.

Obama’s top science and technology advisor John P. Holdren, advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children.

So-called think tanks such as The Royal Society and Club of Rome call for depopulation and/or tyrannical government to restrict human activity, for the earth of course.

World Bank guidelines dictate that in order to qualify for World Bank lending, sovereign nations must implement population reduction objectives as outlined by the World Bank and UN Population Fund. If they refuse, lending will be withdrawn.

Even mainstream publications such as TIME magazine and the Journal of Medical Ethics are conditioning the public to accept mass death.

Unfortunately there is no shortage of the elitists and their organizations calling for humans to be forcibly or covertly culled. They want democide yet refuse to lead by example by starting with themselves.

Despite their own large families, billionaires such as David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, and Bill Gates openly discuss the need to reduce the population and fund programs to do just that.

Eugenicist Bill Gates, purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto in 2010 valued at more than $23 million. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation also supports Planned Parenthood, best known for millions of abortions. Bill Gates’ father even served on the board of Planned Parenthood. In 2000, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provided the International Planned Parenthood Federation $8.8 million.

Planned Parenthood also receives financial support from the federal government, many millionaires, corporations and foundations, including the Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie foundations and billionaire investor Warren Buffet’ s foundation. Planned Parenthood performed 332,278 abortions in the United States in 2009. That is about as many as the 333,012 people who lived in the city of Cincinnati, Ohio, in 2009, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Bill Gates and the Rockefeller foundation also invest heavily in vaccine research for the purposes of sterilizing populations. Gates openly promotes using vaccines to lower the population. While investing with the hope that most of humanity will eat toxic GM foods, Bill Gates decided to also invest some $30 million in a doomsday seed vault on the Barents Sea near the Arctic Ocean. His investment partners include the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto, Syngenta Foundation (Swiss-based major GMO seed and agrichemicals company), DuPont/Pioneer Hi-Bred (one of the world’s largest owners of patented genetically-modified plant seeds and related agrichemicals).

The vault has dual blast-proof doors with motion sensors, two airlocks, and walls of steel-reinforced concrete one meter thick. It will contain up to three million different varieties of seeds from the entire world, ‘so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future.’ Seeds will be specially wrapped to exclude moisture.

Why do these eugenicists and corporations need a seed vault if GM foods and seeds are safe?

The Rockefeller Foundation has been investing in biotechnology for decades in hopes of conquering the world food supply in a similar fashion as they did to medicine, oil, banking and education.

Based on their history and current ambitions of depopulation, do you want the Gates and Rockefeller foundations determining what foods your family should eat?

As the Health Ranger says, GM food may be the new and improved Zyklon B 2.0. Rather than rounding up billions of people and forcing them into chambers (“showers”) before gassing them to death as the Nazis did, GM food victims will pay to purchase their poison and never know why they have cancer and are sterile. After all, the USDA and FDA say GMOs are safe, so it must be true! If Hitler had GMO technology, he would have fed GM corn to the Jews and not even bothered with the trouble of constructing gas chambers.

GM food is like a bait trap for ants or cockroaches. The ant or roach enters the trap, takes the food, and brings it back to the colony which then dies. Toxic GM food works in a similar fashion – mom buys unlabeled GM food at the grocery store, brings it home, and the family eats it. Cancer, infertility and premature death could become abundant based on independent studies.

Here it must be noted that according to at least one study, Glyphosate (toxic ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide) is found in all urine samples. Roundup is sprayed on GM crops and has been linked to birth defects in unborn children. Roundup is also linked to “reproduction problems” and one study found “the herbicide caused an 86-percent decline in the total population of tadpoles.”

California Proposition 37 – Require GM Food Labeling

California Proposition 37 is the wooden stake that California voters can drive through the GM food industry’s criminal corporate hearts on November 6th. If passed, it will require that products containing GM foods be labeled, which is akin to placing a skull and cross bones on the product. Because very few people are willing to knowingly eat GM foods, products containing them will likely be forced by consumer demand to replace GM ingredients to healthier and natural alternatives.

Secret $1.8 Million Cryptocurrency Script

Proposition 37 is a ballot initiative, meaning that over 1,000,0000 people signed a petition to have labeling GM foods placed on the election ballot.

Dr. Mercola, Nature’s Path and other great supporters of humanity support California Proposition 37 financially. They believe that GM foods should be labeled as they are in most of Europe, Russia, China, Japan, Australia, Brazil, India and many other countries.

There are dozens of reasons to support Proposition 37 and Californians can get more information at http://www.carighttoknow.org/. If approved by voters, the labeling initiative would make California the first state in the nation to require labels on genetically engineered crops or processed foods, such as corn, soybeans, sugar beets and Hawaiian papayas. Other states would likely follow.

Proposition 37 opponents have raised more than $32.5 million while Yes on 37 campaign had raised $3.5 million. Despite the financial disparity, Proposition 37 is expected to pass by more than a 2-to-1 margin.

Who would oppose informing consumers that their food has been genetically modified? Below is a list of the top ten contributors to the No on 37 campaign, which is trying to stop GMO labeling in California:

1) Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO, $7,100,500
2) E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., Washington, DC, $4,900,000
3) BASF Plant Science, Research Triangle Park, NC, $2,000,000
4) Bayer CropScience, Research Triangle Park, NC, $2,000,000
5) Dow Agrosciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN, $2,000,000
6) PepsiCo, Inc., Purchase, NY, $1,716,300
7) Nestle USA, Inc., Glendale, CA, $1,169,400
8) Coca-Cola North America, Atlanta, GA, $1,164,400
9) ConAgra Foods, Omaha, NE, $1,076,700
10) Syngenta Corporation, Washington, DC, $1,000,000

Every one of these companies has a critical stake in making sure that you do not know what is in the food you eat because they either produces GMOs or uses GMOs in their product formulations.

Additionally, the companies behind some of the biggest organic brands in the country — Kashi, Cascadian Farm, Horizon Organic oppose GM labeling and Proposition 37.

Conclusion

Independent studies reveal that GM crops are capable of reducing the population by causing increased rates of cancer, organ failure, disease and sterility. GM crops are supported by a small group of billionaires who desire a monopoly of control over the world’s food supply and population. The elite themselves are obsessed with eating organic foods.

As Mike Adams says, the GMO debate is over. There is no longer any legitimate, scientific defense of growing GM crops for human consumption. Anyone eating GMO is slowly committing suicide.

GM foods must be abolished and the first step is ensuring that California Proposition 37 passes. This will also send a message to Bill Gates, the Rockefellers, and the global elite’s corporate crime syndicate that their war on humanity is far from over and that they are simply flawed men, who despite their financial wealth gained through usury and fraud, will never accomplish their “great work” of complete world control.

One man, Percy Schmeiser, defeated Monsanto and saved his farm. Surely 40 million Californians can defeat Monsanto and the other GM food makers this November by passing Proposition 37.

carighttoknow.org

Paul Adams is your humble servant and strongly recommends reading: “Doomsday Seed Vault” in the Arctic – Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t.

Read other articles by Paul Adams HERE

var linkwithin_site_id = 557381;

linkwithin_text=’Related Articles:’

The scheme is financed with a $2mn State Department grant © AFP/File Nima Daymari

AFP

WASHINGTON (AFP) – The US government is financing the development of “shadow” Internet systems to enable dissidents abroad to get around government censors, The New York Times reported on Sunday.

The newspaper said the covert effort also includes attempts to create independent cellphone networks inside foreign countries.

The operation involves a fifth-floor shop on L Street in Washington, where a group of young entrepreneurs are fitting deceptively innocent-looking hardware into a prototype “Internet in a suitcase,” the report said.

Financed with a $2.0 million State Department grant, the suitcase could be secreted across a border and quickly set up to allow wireless communications over a wide area with a link to the global Internet, the paper noted.

Some projects involve technology being developed in the United States while others pull together tools that have already been created by hackers from the so-called liberation technology movement, The Times said.

The State Department is financing the creation of stealth wireless networks that would enable activists to communicate outside the reach of governments in countries like Iran, Syria and Libya, the paper said.

The US government has also spent at least $50 million to create an independent cellphone network in Afghanistan using towers on protected military bases inside the country, The Times said.

It is intended to offset the Taliban’s ability to shut down the official Afghan services, the report noted.

© AFP — Published at Activist Post with license

Organic food, file sharing, and alternative media dealing fatal blows to global corporate oligarchy.

Freedom – Wiki Image

Tony Cartalucci, Contributor
Activist Post

Sun Tzu, author of the ancient and enduring strategy treatise, The Art of War, once said:

Military tactics are like unto water; for water in its natural course runs away from high places and hastens downward. So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong and to strike at what is weak. Water shapes its course according to the nature of the ground over which it flows; the soldier works out his victory in relation to the foe whom he is facing.  

Wind, similarly, finds its way into the weakest points of a roof, and no matter how strong, should it find these points, is capable of taking the entire roof off with a good gust. Imagine increasing global awareness of the disparity and injustice purveyed by global corporate oligarchy as a storm, and imagine the roof of this oligarchy’s house covered in workers trying to tack down these weakest points. Where are they? Where do they fear the wind blowing hardest?

1. Organic Food: The American Revolution began not to fight for independence from England, but to preserve socioeconomic and political independence already achieved by the colonies, an independence the British attempted to reassert themselves over with new regulations and taxes. For all intents and purposes, the American colonies had developed “full set economies” and were no longer dependent on distant imperial administrators.

In a similar manner, today, technology is enabling local communities the ability to become independent from the corporate monopolized production of food, and as more people join the organic food movement, the more mature and independent local networks become. To reassert its control over these increasingly independent local markets, just like the Imperial British, the corporate oligarchy is attempting to impose rules, regulations, and taxes to stifle this movement. An indication of just how insecure the oligarchy is about the organic food movement, is the inordinate amount of time, money, and effort it puts into trying to discredit and dissuade the population from participating in it.

Image: Conflict of interest? Strange that Stanford University is partnered with agricultural giant Cargill and just so happens to come out with a study that suggests organic food is no better than its big-agri competition. According to Stanford University, Cargill has donated at least 5 million dollars  for the creation of a Center on Food Security and the Environment (FSE). Cargill’s website has a page describing its partnership with Stanford which can be found here. Cargill and many others also are listed as donors by Stanford University in their 2011 Annual Report (page 38, .pdf).

Mega-corporate global genetically modifying poisoner of food, Cargill, was recently exposed as being behind a so-called “Stanford study” purporting the negligence of benefits offered by organic foods. The Standford study was touted by the corporate-media in a concerted campaign to double up the “roof” as the winds of change continue to blow.

The discredited Stanford study was followed up by a more recent paper put out by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), covered in MSNBC’s article “Organic food no better than conventional for kids, pediatricians say.” The same flawed, unconvincing argument made by Cargill-funded Stanford researchers was repeated verbatim by AAP, this time, the lie specifically targeting children. Ironically enough, a search for the AAP article revealed another interesting headline from MSNBC titled, “Pesticides in food linked to ADHD in kids.”

So despite the attempted hype, it seems organic food, grown locally and free of pesticides and the toxic affects of genetic manipulation (GMO), contains obvious benefits many more honest scientists are recognizing in greater numbers than Cargill, Monsanto, and the fraudulent Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation can counteract with paid-for “studies” and PR campaigns.

Image: The American Enterprise Institute (AEI), a paragon of all that is wrong in the world today, wants you to eat your GMO, somewhat even more disturbing than finding simply Monsanto or Cargill driving pro-GMO propaganda. Neo-eugencists like Jon Entine have a platform to peddle their ideology and support for corporate-monopolized biotechnology because of the backing of influential think-tanks like AEI.

More disturbing than perhaps manipulated studies put out by Cargill & Co. through increasingly discredited institutionalized “academia,” are modern day eugenicist outfits like the “Genetic Literacy Project” (GLP) run by corporate-financier American Enterprise Institute (AEI) think-tank “fellow,” Jon Entine. Entine is a proponent of racial superiority, and uses his background in genetics, as the Anglo-Americans and Nazis similarly used “science,” to prove their 20th century eugenicist theories. While racist crackpots like Entine are a dime a dozen, what sets him apart is the substantial funding and backing he receives from the Fortune 500 corporate oligarchy through his AEI ties. 

His GLP site, in addition to repacking Anglo-American-Nazi eugenics, selling “race determines intelligence,” Entine is busy bolstering the corporate-monopolized biotechnology industry in articles like, “Malpractice on Dr. Oz: Pop health expert hosts anti-GM food rant; Scientists push back.” Of course by “scientists,” Entine means Monsanto, Cargill, Bayer, “scientists,” who are on par with the intellectual dishonesty of Stanford researchers who published their findings regarding organic food without transparently disclosing their ties to Cargill.

GLP represents a team of workers out in the stormy winds of change, desperately trying to tack down the weakest points in the roof of global corporate oligarchy. Just like the American colonies developing their economy beyond dependence on Imperial Britain, global populations are recognizing the benefits and necessity of developing independently of monopolizing big-agriculture. 

To blow the roof off, start with something as simple as visiting and supporting your local farmers’ market, planting even just your own fresh herbs on a window sill, boycotting Fortune 500 junk food, and spreading a general awareness of the obvious connection between natural food and human health.

2. File Sharing: Downloading songs, movies, and books for free is deemed “illegal.” Then again, so was circumventing the British tea tax. A tyranny that thinks it can hide behind the color of law will simply make living free, and the human progress that engenders independence and self-sufficiency an illegal, criminal act. Dumping tea into the harbor was a revolutionary act, signaling to the Imperial British that the self-serving bindings of their “law” were similarly being dumped with it.

Image: The intellectual property racket does to global human information, what GMO proponents do to the global food supply, poison it, dominate it, monopolize, and monetize it, stifiling our collective well being and progress. Boycott and seek to replace the memberships of all these organizations with local, open source, alternatives. 

In reality, if you have bought a CD and then decide to give it to a friend, or sell it second hand, it is well within your right to do so. You have not committed a crime in the realm of common sense, and for now, even in legal terms you have done nothing wrong. Technology simply allows you to give that CD away to millions of people – through file sharing. No physical property is being stolen from the corporations that have sold you that CD, therefore it is not, and never will be theft.

File sharing, and computers in general have given rise to the term “disruptive technology,” or technology that disrupts established paradigms. The concept of disruptive technology is not new though. The horseless carriage was a disruptive technology that put traditional carriage makers out of business. Cheaper means of printing have threatened publishers and authors who remain stuck in traditional and very antiquated business models. Imagine the leaps and bounds human progress would never have made if obsolete business models were able to impose their will on humanity through the color of law, and prevent competition from infringing upon their self-proclaimed rights, conveniently contrived and manipulated to meet and defeat any and all new innovations.

File sharing is not stealing. It never was and never will be. No matter how many laws the antiquated media monopolies pass, no matter how many official-sounding agencies and guilds they construct, there is nothing wrong, no theft occurring when people share. The Founding Fathers dumped tea into the harbor. Modern day revolutionaries share files.

If the risk of file sharing seems too great, there are other things you can do that are just as helpful. This includes simply innovating and supporting new ways of creating, sharing, and profiting from all forms of media, competing with, and ultimately replacing traditional corporate media business models.

Already, with the Internet, small independent movies, music, and art of all kinds have flourished and have proven there is creativity and profit beyond the boundaries of legally protected “intellectual property.” Open source is a concept that is gaining momentum and disrupting legal paradigms just as technology is disrupting economic paradigms.

Secret $1.8 Million Cryptocurrency Script

By supporting open source alternative media, in the realm of software, music, movies, and now even hardware, you are doing the next best thing to file sharing – a modern equivalent of flaunting the laws of a tired imperial captor.

3. Alternative Media: A death of a thousand cuts. That is what the corporate media is suffering. For every viewer disgusted with biased, dishonest, clearly corporate-financier motivated propaganda that decides to turn off the TV and begin a blog, website, radio show, or local movement, a tiny, but permanent cut is made. A single blog may seem insignificant – especially if it only reposts news an individual finds more honest and congruent with reality than what is seen on network TV. But collectively, this has had a huge impact.

10 years ago lies that would go unquestioned have now sparked immediate and widespread backlash. The example above, regarding the Cargill-funded Stanford study, received immediate skepticism, scrutiny and eventually condemnation.

Image: The cover of Cass Sunstein’s “Conspiracy Theories” paper, which details strategies for overcoming opposing views that contradict establishment talking points. Amongst these strategies includes hiring people to actively infiltrate segments of society that hold alternative views and introduce “informational diversity” to lure them back into mainstream paradigms. Classic examples of cognitive infiltration can be seen behind the “left” Kony 2012 scam, and “right” Glenn Beck, and WorldNetDaily projects. 

Just like with organic food and disruptive technology, measures have been formulated to deal with a burgeoning alternative media. Cass Sunstein’s “Conspiracy Theories” paper describes potential means of infiltrating and co-opting paradigms that have drifted away from the mainstream. And while with cognitive infiltrators and faux-alternative outfits created by the corporate oligarchy to manage this backlash do occasionally make inroads – they usually don’t for long. The real alternative media eventually finds them, exposes them, and neutralizes their toxic effects.

Making a blog is free, maintaining it with weekly updates can be done easily in the amount of time most people waste watching CNN, Fox News, or BBC. The amount of money people waste on newspapers and magazines emanating from the corporate oligarchy’s propaganda machine could just as easily be directed toward donation buttons and online stores found on your favorite alternative media site. It is a small step we can each individually make, that collectively allows us to make great strides forward in reasserting the will of the people over the minuscule membership and self-serving destructive interests of global corporate-financier oligarchy.

RELATED ACTIVIST POST ARTICLE: 
10 Ways to Stop Being a Slave and Bring Down the Pyramids of Control

Tony Cartalucci’s articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report.   Read other contributed articles by Tony Cartalucci here.

var linkwithin_site_id = 557381;

linkwithin_text=’Related Articles:’

Susanne Posel, Contributor
Activist Post

The Biometric Database Law, originated in Israel, determines fingerprints and facial recognition software use to collect data on Israeli citizens as justified by decree of the Israeli government. This data is used for identification purposes by law enforcement and governmental agencies to deter criminal activity. However, the Israeli government collects massive amounts of data on its citizens that violate their inherent right to privacy.

Israeli residents are subject to biometric tracking through passports and identification cards.

In the UK, the National Pupil Database (NPD) houses biometric information about British students for use of the government. The Administrative Data Liaison Service describes the NPD as “one of the richest education datasets in the world, holding a wide range of information about students who attend schools and colleges in England. The NPD combines the examination results of pupils with information on pupil and school characteristics and is an amalgamation of a number of different datasets, including Key State attainment data and Schools Census data (formerly known as PLASC) which are linked using a unique identifier for each pupil.”

The Biometrics Institute (BI), an international coalition of biometric users, academics and industry members want the UK government to rethink their widening use of the NPD as well as their burgeoning use of biometric technologies to create database profiles on citizens. BI is concerned that private sector corporations would now have access to the NPD, which would open the door for Facebook and Google to use this information for nefarious purposes.

The BI was formed to “promote the responsible use of biometrics as an international forum for biometric users and other interested parties.” Their goals are to make sure:

• Promote ethical use of biometric technologies


• Retain privacy considerations


• Educate the public, governments and corporations on biometrics


• Influence standards of use of biometrics


• Test technology for on behalf of the industry


• Encourage research and development of biometrics

The Department of Education in the UK uses this database which stores extremely sensitive information about students, their parents’ social and educational background, finances, health, intelligence and social training, personal information, mental health records, as well as fingerprints and facial recognition.

Terry Aulich, chair of the BI Privacy Committee explained:

Privacy breaches can have dangerous and disturbing consequences. All parents and pupils need water-tight guarantees to prevent any personal data, whether it is linked or consolidated, getting into the wrong hands or being misused by external groups such as the media and marketers, and criminals. Children cannot exercise informed consent about how their data is used and their parents are often unaware of the risks.

More than 200 CCTV cameras have been installed in bathrooms and changing rooms to monitor students in the UK. Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch said that parents were not aware of this new development and that schools should explain what is being done with the footage recorded.

These cameras were installed in 207 schools in England, Scotland and Wales. While the reasoning for this development is explained as necessary to thwart crime, there is no significant research proving that CCTV cameras lower crime rates.

Google’s Conversions API is an advertising project that allows corporations to use user profiles to track their consumer habits offline as well as online. C-API will combine real-life data with online user information in order to “bring offline into your online world.”

Tracking consumers by in-store transactions, call-tracking coupled with online activities will be entered into Google. Marketing will be enhanced with optimized “campaigns based on even more of your business data.”

Servers around the world will track and trace consumers using digital information collected in the real world. Biometrics plays a part in this Big Brother system that justifies this initiative under the guise of marketing; however, Google has been under request of the US government for information they have collected on users.

In June, Google admitted they have been told by authorities from various governments, by way of more than 1,000 requests, to remove content from YouTube in the last 6 months of 2011. Google says this is “an alarming trend”. This is an attempt to subvert responsibility from the mega search engine, who works for the National Security Agency (NSA).

Google has “clarified” their statements on tracking consumers on and offline by stating that Google is only allowing advertisers to use data already collected in their marketing campaigns. Google claims not to be actually applying “phone-tracking” data to their searchable digital stores. This back-tracking of their original statements is more telling than the actual statement.

The Department of Defense (DoD) is using biometrics to fight terrorism, catalogue active duty troops and maintain national security interests. The Biometrics Identity Management Agency (BIMA) utilizes biometrics to “identify the enemy” and verify individuals to ensure secure business and governmental functions.

The US Department of State Consular Consolidated Database (CCD) has more than 90 million people’s photographs databased with the continuous use of the Department of Facial Recognition Software. The US Department of Homeland Security Automated Biometric Identification System tracks an estimated 250,000 biometric communications per day. Over 126 million fingerprints, photographs and biographical information are filed for the US government to use at their discretion.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CL3Mjn7uAnA?feature=player_embedded]

Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism. Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream media. You can find us on our Facebook page.

image source

Julie Beal
Activist Post

The drums of war are beating, diverting our attention, as always, to the stories scripted by the mainstream media. Meanwhile, plans for the New World Order are being perfected: large-scale biomass plants, to produce anything from fuel, to paints, and plastics; the monetization of natural, human, and social capital, and an Army of Mayors to create the ‘Green’ and ‘Sustainable’ Local Communities. These eco-municipalities will be nodes in the global network, overseen by the Master Hubs, which function like the ‘vital organs’ of the vast complex adaptive system the Internet/life has become.

We must not focus solely on the war, or the shock, but what is to come after.

The Smart World Order will be run by an all-knowing quantum computer, for optimisation of the new capital (people, nature, and data) alongside the traditional products, services, and built infrastructure. Everything is to have a unique identifier, to enable the quantum algorithms and social simulations, which are required to keep the show running in what they hope will be a truly sustainable fashion. The United Nations is now calling for this ‘steady state system’, which requires an understanding of all capital stock, and all transactions. This is the oft-described transhumanist military-industrial complex – but with a purpose, an ‘ideology’ (the FULL blueprint of Agenda 21), which may sound alluring to many.

It may just be the power of the MSM, but recently it’s as though ‘us lot’ are feeling the sense of an imminent global shock of some sort – but the furthest people seem to get with how to respond to this is survivalism. Stocking up to survive a potential shock is very wise indeed, but what about afterwards? When things have ‘settled down’. We really should be paying attention – NOW – to the plans the powers-that-be have formulated, and the future they are envisioning, shock, or no shock.

I am already quaking in my boots, because as a UK citizen I am about to be forced to sign up with an Identity Provider. Against my wishes, the government is putting all of my personal details into the matrix, where, as we know, they are vulnerable to EMP attacks, and hacks of all kinds; they are often monitored; and they are always recoverable. To be able to function in society, I must not only submit to this, but I must grant a private company something akin to the power-of-attorney, to manage my digitised credentials, many of which are hosted in the cloud, by a one-manned company (Skyscape), using software contracted from a private American company called EMC Global Services.

Unless people wise up to this almost-unheard-of news, we will all be forced to get a global smart ID. What does that mean? It’s what we’ve all been dreading, is what it is … it’s your unique identification number; the sign of all that you are, including your biometrics. If allowed to happen, we will be ONE STEP AWAY FROM IMPLANTS.

Your ID will be smart because it’s stored on a microchip, and with it comes your one-and-only password for everything. You’re gonna need that password to be part of society in the near future, because the plan is to move everything online. And I mean everything.

So instead of having a driving licence, or a health card, or a student card, or a credit card, or whatever, you just use your smart ID. Life is moving to the matrix. No more paper. No more privacy, or self-control.

Even surfing the Web will be different, because you’re supposed to use your smart ID to do a one-time log-in, then your Identity Provider will vouch for you for every website you interact with.

You can store your identity data on your smart phone, or a smart card, or you could even buy a microSD (a secure element) to make your old mobile phone be smart.

The way it works is, you sign up with an Identity Provider (IdP), enrol your biometrics (probably face and fingerprints) and provide the appropriate evidence of who you are. This IdP will then be in control of all your private details. When you need to confirm your identity for some reason (such as applying for State benefits) you will be asked to produce the necessary credentials for that transaction, and the Identity Provider will act as a go-between, confirming the identities of both parties. The level of authentication required depends on the circumstances. If you wanted to get into a nightclub, say, you might just have to prove your age, so all the IdP will tell the nightclub is your date of birth. If, however, you are applying for a passport online, the highest level of security is required, meaning you’d have to authorise the IdP to confirm all your credentials.

Credentials can be the usual “name/age/address” sorta stuff, as well as your passport and/or driving licence, your digital history (which helps ‘prove’ you exist), your financial details, relationship network, police records, transaction context data, and biometrics. All of these details add up to the unique ID which is YOU. The IdP collates them for you. Sucked into the matrix, we would be, then watched and controlled by the AI machine.

Identity management already exists for military personnel and civil servants, and globally interoperable standards have emerged. Over the last decade, identity specialists have crafted a number of methods for a global system for all citizens of the earth. They hold meetings[1] and engage with the NFC community at the World e-ID Congress, for instance.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4CrD_zfP08?feature=player_detailpage]

Most countries now have biometric passports, and the UK and the US are leading the way in creating the global identity ecosystem.

We’re told:

1. ‘we need protecting, and they can protect us’ – but putting our identities into the matrix then granting control of our identities to a government-friendly corporation enables tyranny, forever.


2. ‘the data isn’t centralised’ – but every time ID credentials are checked, they are aggregated!


3. ‘It’s voluntary, and we are in control because we get to authorise which credentials are given out’ – but in reality, the service providers will dictate which details they require us to provide; if you don’t comply, you don’t the service.


4. ‘It’s good for e-commerce’ – but the IdPs need to make money too.


5. ‘Our identities will be hidden from other companies and organisations’ – but not all of them!

So they’re trying to sell it as if it’s all done for the benefit of the consumer. We are being told ‘this will make it so much easier to do things online – you only have to remember one password, you only have to log in once’.

But actually, the global interplay of production-and-consumption can only be managed from the top, in the name of sustainability, when each and every ‘thing’ is tagged and labelled with an ID. This Internet-of-things-and-people can then become an efficient machine, processing all transactions on a global scale, from the RFIDs in consumer products, to sensors and smart cards that process all the many identities of people and devices. The ultimate aim is to achieve (the illusion of) a global steady-state system, maintaining perfect ‘balance’.

What you take out, you must put back in.

Putting our identities into the matrix, instead of storing our own passports, driving licences, keys, tickets, credit cards, etc ourselves, will make us so very vulnerable.

We are soooo hackable!

An article entitled, ‘On technology neutral policies for e–identity: A critical reflection based on UK identity policy’ (Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology; Vol. 8, No.2; 2013), by Edgar A. Whitley, argues that there are other cryptographic techniques which, “offer zero–knowledge proofs and are not based on databases or transactional surveillance grids”, such as an age-verification method devised by Touch2id, which does not store a copy of the fingerprint. However, no effort is being made to develop “systems that are unable to distinguish between two transactions by the same person / device and two transactions by two different entities”. Nor are the public being involved in a debate. The system has been devised, and now they want us to comply.

What makes this all the more real, and happening right now, is that currently over a third of the world’s population are using the Internet regularly, and it is reported that,

The number of Internet users around the world is soaring and will total about 3.5 billion – or about half the Earth’s estimated population of about 7.4 billion in 2017, according to a Sept. 4 report from Forrester Research. That means that about 1.1 billion additional people around the world will be online in the next five years, up from about 2.4 billion people who are online in 2012. 

The report, Forrester Research World Online Population Forecast, 2012 to 2017 (Global), “found that 2.4 billion people across the world use the Internet on a regular basis … 

… One year ago, an IDC report predicted that mobile Internet usage will top desktop usage by 2015. The report noted that the impact of smartphones and tablet computer adoption would be so great that the number of users accessing the Internet through PCs would first stagnate and then slowly decline.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5_H-hmNPTk?feature=player_detailpage]

Mobile phone use has accelerated rapidly around the world, including the poorest countries; indeed;

Between 2000 and 2010, the number of mobile users in developing countries surpassed those in high-income nations, jumping from 29 per cent to 77 in less-developed areas. 

Already, between 80 and 95 per cent of the population of Kenya, Mexico, and Indonesia send text messages. 

In the 12 years since the turn of the century, mobile phones have multiplied the world over, growing from less than 1 billion in use, to 6 billion this year – a pace that is unmatched in the history of technology, the World Bank said.”

A report released by the ITU, called Measuring the Information Society 2012,

… looked at 155 countries, assessing their access to and use of information and communication technology (ICT)…. The Geneva-based agency also said almost two billion people – about one-third of the world’s population – had been internet users by the end of 2011. 

In developed countries, 70% of the population was online, compared with 24% in developing regions, it said. 

There were almost twice as many mobile broadband subscriptions globally as fixed broadband ones, said the agency. 

The director of ITU’s Telecommunication Development Bureau, Brahima Sanou, said: “The surge in numbers of mobile-broadband subscriptions in developing countries has brought the internet to a multitude of new users.”

Secret $1.8 Million Cryptocurrency Script

What is more, a number of organisations and financiers have joined together to form the Better Than Cash Alliance, which is promoting the use of electronic payments in the developing world using mobile phones.

Natural Capital Accounting has also been agreed to by 172 nations, as per Agenda 21, and globally interoperable online identity systems are being created all around the world.

They just need us to have a smart phone, to get an IdP, and to stop using cash.

The chip for all these things will have to worn or implanted at some point, will it not? After all, the chip will be the key to life itself.

Will you comply?

Comments and bright ideas please write below, or email me at getmindsmart.com

Better still, write about this now… links available on my website. Thanks for reading. I cannot do this alone.

Notes:
[1] See, for instance, “NSTIC in Motion: Pilots and Progress”, which mentions “the government’s new Federal Cloud Credential Exchange (FCCX), and updates from the privately-led Identity Ecosystem Steering Group (IDESG).”http://cloudidentitysummit.com/agenda/workshops.cfm

This article first appeared at Get Mind Smart

Julie Beal is a UK-based independent researcher who has been studying the globalist agenda for more than 20 years. Please visit her website, Get Mind Smart, for a wide range of information about Agenda 21, Communitarianism, Ethics, Bioscience, and much more.