By Matt Agorist

Once the talk of conspiracy theorists — the rich ingesting the blood of the young to foster longevity — is now a reality and an actual business in the United States. Not only is it a business but billionaires are actually admitting their interest in it. Now, even the mainstream media is reporting it.

“Could the secret to eternal youth be found in blood transfusions from young people? Some claim that transfusions with “young blood” from teenagers can reverse the aging process,” the report from CBS reads.



“I’m looking into parabiosis stuff, which I think is really interesting. This is where they did the young blood into older mice and they found that had a massive rejuvenating effect,” Peter Thiel, the billionaire co-founder of PayPal and adviser to Donald Trump told Inc. magazine. “I think there are a lot of these things that have been strangely under-explored.”

But it’s no longer an experiment with just mice. The startup company by Jesse Karmazin, Ambrosia, is doing this with humans, and the rich are lining up to get the blood of the young.

“Their brains are younger, their hearts. Their hair, if it was gray, it turns dark again,” Karmazin said of the treatment.

As Vanity Fair reports, Ambrosia, which buys its blood from blood banks, now has about 100 paying customers. Some are Silicon Valley technologists, like Thiel, though Karmazin stressed that tech types aren’t Ambrosia’s only clients and that anyone over 35 is eligible for its transfusions.

As The Free Thought Project reported in January, a study published in Science and Nature Medicine revealed that transfusing young mouse blood into old mice can actually prevent the symptoms of aging. This groundbreaking discovery could lead to medical breakthroughs and the development of new medicines. However, a report from the Vice health news outlet Tonic has pointed out far more sinister applications for this knowledge.

Rich, old people want to use the blood of the youth in order to live longer. pic.twitter.com/sfVZBWbLjG

— TONIC (@dailytonic) January 5, 2017

It was suggested in the report that aging elites are using the blood of young people as a type of youth serum. Now, we know that they actually are using it.

“We found that it was safe and feasible to administer infusions of young plasma weekly,” Dr. Sharon Shaw, an Alzheimer’s researcher at Stanford, said.

A similar claim was made by journalist Jeff Bercovici last year, after he conducted several interviews with Silicon Valley aristocrats including Peter Thiel, and learned about this transfusion procedure called “parabiosis,” where the blood of young people is used to prevent aging.

“There are widespread rumors in Silicon Valley, where life-extension science is a popular obsession, that various wealthy individuals from the tech world have already begun practicing parabiosis, spending tens of thousands of dollars for the procedures and young-person-blood, and repeating the exercise several times a year,” Bercovici reported.

In his article, Bercovici also expressed concerns about a developing black market for young people’s blood.

While there is certainly nothing wrong with willing young adults selling their blood to the elite, the underlying theme of this practice has strong roots in the occult.

Avoiding The Eye - Ships Free Today!

In most modern cultures, mass murder and human sacrifice still takes place out in the open under the cover of warfare, while many argue that cannibalism also still takes place but behind closed doors.

It is only in the past few hundred years that the practice of cannibalism among royals has not been publicized. In Europe, around the time of the American Revolution “corpse medicine” was very popular among the ruling class, Charles II even brewed his own.

Dr Richard Sugg of Durham University has conducted extensive research into the practice of corpse medicine among the royalty.

“The human body has been widely used as a therapeutic agent with the most popular treatments involving flesh, bone or blood. Cannibalism was found not only in the New World, as often believed, but also in Europe,” Sugg said.

“One thing we are rarely taught at school yet is evidenced in literary and historic texts of the time is this: James I refused corpse medicine; Charles II made his own corpse medicine; and Charles I was made into corpse medicine. Along with Charles II, eminent users or prescribers included Francis I, Elizabeth I’s surgeon John Banister, Elizabeth Grey, Countess of Kent, Robert Boyle, Thomas Willis, William III, and Queen Mary,” he added.

If this wasn’t strange enough, the current royal family of England claims to be direct descendants of Prince Vlad III Dracula of Wallachia (modern Romania). This was the sick and depraved ruler, Vlad the Impaler, who was known as a butcher and who eventually became the inspiration for the most famous vampire stories in history.

Aside from the gruesome historical and occult background of such practices, there is a lack of data that suggests the process even works. Despite Karmazin’s claims that “young blood is causing changes that appear to make the aging process reverse,” scientists have yet to identify a link between blood transfusions from the young and any tangible health benefits.

“There‘s just no clinical evidence [that the treatment will be beneficial], and you‘re basically abusing people‘s trust and the public excitement around this,” Stanford University neuroscientist Tony Wyss-Coray, who conducted a 2014 study of young blood plasma in mice, told Science magazine last summer, as reported by Vanity Fair.

Matt Agorist is an honorably discharged veteran of the USMC and former intelligence operator directly tasked by the NSA. This prior experience gives him unique insight into the world of government corruption and the American police state. Agorist has been an independent journalist for over a decade and has been featured on mainstream networks around the world. Agorist is also the Editor at Large at the Free Thought Project, where this article first appeared. Follow @MattAgorist on Twitter, Steemit, and now on Facebook.

Drudge Facing Copyright Lawsuit over this image and link Image: Denver Post (gotta cover our ass too)

Eric Blair
Activist Post

Shady Las Vegas copyright infringement company, Righthaven LLC, seems to be a small-time legal firm using a canned lawsuit to slap down bloggers for copyright infringement for meager settlements. But now they are going after alternative news kingpin and globalist critic Matt Drudge of the Drudge Report.

Righthaven claims that Drudge knowingly misused a Denver Post copyrighted photo of a TSA agent groping the crotch of a male traveler, along with a link to a story about airport security on the Las Vegas Review-Journal website.  Righthaven is seeking copyright infringement damages of $150,000 and forfeiture of his domain name.

Drudge Report was instrumental in inciting the recent TSA revolt by repeatedly posting stories that exposed rights abuses by Big Brother, or “Big Sis” when referring to DHS Sec. Janet Napolitano.  It seems, this time, Drudge went too far by posting the obvious headline to the groping photo; TSA XXX: Airport Wants ‘Opt Out.’

According to the Las Vegas Sun, a newspaper competitor of Las Vegas Review-Journal, these lawsuits are a new type of legal enterprise:

The Review-Journal’s copyright enforcement partner, Las Vegas company Righthaven LLC, has sued 98 North American websites and blogsites in federal court in Las Vegas since March — typically demanding $75,000 in damages and forfeiture of the defendants’ website domain names.

Attorneys say the Righthaven lawsuits are unprecedented in recent memory because, in the past, newspapers dealt with online copyright infringement by simply asking infringing websites to remove the infringing material and to replace it with a link to the source newspaper. Most Righthaven defendants say they were sued without warning and without anyone from the Review-Journal informing them there was a concern with their use of Review-Journal material.

None of Righthaven’s lawsuits have had a judge rule on their validity although several cases are pending.  Instead, their practice appears to be a business scheme to make the defendants settle out of court:

Twenty-two of the suits have been settled and closed under generally undisclosed terms, though court filings revealed two defendants paid $2,185 and $5,000, respectively, to close their cases. The settling defendants haven’t had to forfeit their website domain names (Las Vegas Sun).

These settlements hardly appear to be worth the trouble, especially considering it cost them around $1,500 for each lawsuit and they’ve gone after blogs with as little as 20 hits a day leading one defendant to call it extortion:

‘It’s legal extortion,’ said Mostofi, who fears he may be forced to pay a cash settlement to avoid the expense of a court fight. ‘They’re going after small bloggers who can’t afford representation.’

Media watchdogs are monitoring the lawsuits closely to see if a judge will ultimately rule in one of these cases, thus setting a precedent that will surely send shock waves to independent news blogs.  This golden precedent may be the actual goal of Righthaven’s enterprise.  A closer look at the company reveals some very close ties to the most nefarious globalists.

According to RighthavenLawsuits.com (which is not affiliated with Righthaven LLC):

Righthaven LLC is owned 50/50 by two limited liability companies.  The first is Net Sortie Systems, LLC, which is owned by Las Vegas attorney Steven Gibson – the Nevada attorney who is behind all of the lawsuits filed by Righthaven.  The second is SI Content Monitor LLC, which is owned by family members of investment banking billionaire Warren Stephens whose investments include Stephens Media LLC which owns the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 

The billionaire Warren Stephens made his money as an off-Wall Street banker whose clients include some very powerful elitist organizations:

Secret $1.8 Million Cryptocurrency Script

The firm, a closely held family enterprise which doesn’t have to make its investments public, touts itself as the largest brokerage off Wall Street. Now run by Warren Stephens, the firm’s list of clients includes the Waltons, Tyson Foods, Monsanto and whatever interests David Rockefeller (Council for the Americas, Council on Foreign Relations, etc.) might have. Stephens Inc. is proud to be off-Wall Street, but they do deals with Goldman Sachs and Lazard Freres on a regular basis.

Matt Drudge has always proven to be a thorn in the Left side of politics, but as of late he has also taken on the globalists.  Intriguingly, the most notable and quotable of said globalists are all listed as Mr. Stephens’ primary clients.  Because of his success and readership power, Drudge also has been the target of proposed website taxes, appropriately dubbed the “Drudge tax.”

At first glance it would seem that Drudge would crush this puny ambulance-chasing law business, yet when these globalists are lurking in the nearby shadows, you can bet these copyright infringement cases have an ulterior motive of silencing their critics.  This is nothing more than a blatant tactic to squelch free speech in the Internet’s swelling “infowar.”

Given the damage that “Anonymous” hacktivists have done to major corporate websites over freedom of speech violations, the list of newspapers who are Righthaven’s current clients here, here, and here may need to boost their Internet security.

(Keep tabs on journalist Steve Green of the Las Vegas Sun who has been covering Righthaven from the beginning.)

RECENTLY by Eric Blair:
Wikileaks Being Used to Justify ‘Patriot Act’ Legislation for Internet
Endgame Legislation: Lame Duck Session Ushers in Tyranny

/* */




/* */

Myce image

Eric Blair
Activist Post

The establishment has been desperately trying to implement legal control over the Internet. They’re attacking freedom of speech and the open Internet from all angles; through government tools, corporate methods, and even the courts. All three of these methods are converging in the WikiLeaks case, but that’s not the only battle being waged in the so-called “all-out cyber war.”

The government, through the DHS, has already shut down over 80 websites for copyright infringement without due process, in addition to floating the idea to tax information websites. Corporations like Google, Verizon, and others are making deals to tip the Internet in favor of major players.  Finally, in the courts, ambulance-chasing copyright infringement lawyers are bullying blogs to pay settlements despite Fair Use rights — while their ultimate goal is to set a golden precedent with which to attack all news aggregating websites.

Don’t you see what’s happening here as the media continues to hype this cyber war?  Because of the fierce resistance to all proposed changes to the Internet, they need an Internet “Pearl Harbor” to usher in these draconian laws. As the hacktivist army of WikiLeaks defenders are now reportedly turning their focus on UK government websites, we can expect that after the first major Web interruption, governments will convene urgent meetings to demand better enforcement and more control over the Internet.

Therefore this cyber war would seem to be playing right into their hands — as already, mainstream polling on the sheeple ranch called the United States shows that 70% believe Julian Assange and WikiLeaks is doing harm and should be prosecuted.  It won’t be difficult to convince the masses to shut down dissent if essential infrastructure is “attacked” in this all-out war.  Especially if that infrastructure is the Web itself.

Indeed, even the aware among us would suffer greatly if the Internet was down for multiple days.  It is our heroin, our entertainment, our news, our communication medium,  our livelihood . . . in essence, our freedom.  I think most of us would beg for at least limited access after less than a week of being blacked out.  We’d be on our hands and knees saying, “We don’t need all of it; just give us enough access to get our fix.  Please, I’ll even register for an Internet tracking ID number.”

Incidentally, it would seem the elite know the power they have over this technical opiate of the masses simply by shutting it down when the offensive anarchy gets too chaotic.  They will simply switch the Fortune 1000 over to Internet 2 and let us vermin swim in the virus-ridden battle-torn Internet 1.  Don’t worry, though, they’ll let us buy controlled access to their network where they will openly track, trace, and database our every keystroke and mouse click.

However, this war is not about technology, it is about the freedom of information and ability to view it in privacy.  Anyone who is fundamentally against WikiLeaks is the enemy of free speech, because WikiLeaks has become the poster child for the people’s right to information.  The stronger a critic expresses their disdain for WikiLeaks, the more tyrannical we can expect the response to be.  In other words, the more dangerous they can make WikiLeaks out to be, calling them “high-tech terrorist” and the like, the further the compromise bar is pushed in the establishment’s direction.

Secret $1.8 Million Cryptocurrency Script

Because the establishment is already in control of the technical gears of the Internet, they can and will win a technical cyber war — even if they have to go nuclear and pull the plug to do it.  The hacktivists fighting for Internet free speech have truth and principle on their side, yet they may be falling into the King’s trap quite effectively.  Just as the establishment needs violent street protests to justify their armored police state, they also need offensive protests by these hacktivists to justify policing the Internet.

Victor Hugo famously said, “All the forces in the world are not so powerful as an idea whose time has come.”  The ideas of liberty, justice, peace, and the right to open-source knowledge has come of age; it is clear that the globalist machine is opposed to these ideals — thus they’re losing the information war.  Therefore, they must attack the battlefield of the infowar under the pretext of protecting cyberspace from those pesky freedom-of-speech bandits.

This so-called cyber war will likely fester into a Pearl Harbor-type event.  When it occurs, the mainstream media will incite fear in one hand and sell the solution out of the other.  We must be aware of their tactics and keep fighting for Internet freedom with heavy doses of the truth.

RECENTLY by Eric Blair:
Copyright Extortionist Sues Drudge, Backed by Globalists
WikiLeaks Being Used to Justify “Patriot Act” Legislation for Internet

Brandon Turbeville
Activist Post 

For those who may regard movies such as The Matrix and Ghost in the Shell as mere science fiction, picking up the latest issue of TIME just might shake up these assumptions a bit. Entitled 2045: The Year Man Becomes Immortal,  the cover illustration for the February 21 edition portrays a human with a shaved head plugged into the Internet – literally.  On the back of this person’s head is an embedded terminal plug for the purpose of connecting with the Internet; the same as Neo in The Matrix or any one of the “cyberized” characters in Ghost in the Shell.

Enter the “Singularity” movement. As defined by TIME, singularity means, “The moment when technological change becomes so rapid and profound, it represents a rupture in the fabric of human history.”  This definition will no doubt be an accurate one if Singularitarians (as they are deemed by TIME) have their way.

Although Lev Grossman’s article is mostly a regurgitatingly obnoxious form of worship of one of the more active frontmen for Transhumanism, Raymond Kurzweil, the article does reveal some extraordinary information. Namely, that there are very powerful and wealthy individuals whose goal it is to see the merging of man and machine, and the complete transformation of humanity into something much different than it currently is.

Of course this, in and of itself, is not major news. What’s news is that they are becoming so open about it. Indeed, many researchers such as Alan Watt, Alex Jones , and David Icke (and many others) have been pointing this out for years. However, while they have been derided as crazy conspiracy theorists, it’s not likely that TIME will receive the same treatment. TIME has functioned as a mouthpiece for the eugenics elite for well over seventy years. Thus, it appears the magazine is once again assuming its role in the introduction of the “new man” to the old one. It is now time for the unwashed masses to accept brainchips, cyberization, and the biological reconstruction envisioned by the elite since at least as far back as the time of Plato.

The subject of TIME’s admiration this time around, Raymond Kurzweil, does not deny that humans, as we currently know ourselves, will cease to exist with the introduction of his Singularity technology. On the contrary, Grossman writes:

When that (the introduction of superintelligent computers) happens, humanity – our bodies, our minds, our civilization – will be completely and irreversibly transformed. He (Kurzweil) believes that this moment is not only inevitable but imminent. According to his calculations, the end of human civilization as we know it is about 35 years away.

Grossman continues:

Maybe we’ll merge with them to become superintelligent cyborgs, using computers to extend our intellectual abilities the same way that cars and planes extend our physical abilities. Maybe the artificial intelligences will help us treat the effects of old age and prolong our life indefinitely. Maybe we’ll scan our consciousnesses into computers and live inside them as software, forever, virtually. Maybe the computers will turn on humanity and annihilate us. The one thing all these theories have in common is the transformation of our species into something that is no longer recognizable as such to humanity circa 2011. This transformation has a name: Singularity.

There is little doubt that a great many of those children raised on television, video games, and the Internet will embrace such technology with open arms as adults. Already, online communities, various apps, and social networking sites have begun to supplant the real world in the minds of many. It would not likely take much prodding to convince at least the first few pioneers to, as Grossman puts it, “take the iPhones out of our hands and put them into our skulls.”

With the recent introduction of Cloud technology, the creation of an ethereal Internet reality that operates and exists completely as a world of its own is not hard to imagine. Coupled with the introduction and increased promotion of various forms of brainchips, all that really might be necessary is an effective computer program and a willing population. The program no doubt already exists. Unfortunately, it seems only a matter before the population follows suit.

It is interesting to note a report by Richard Norton-Taylor entitled Revolution, flashmobs, and brain chips. A grim vision of the future, published in the Guardian in 2007. In this article, Norton-Taylor relays the findings of a 90-page report released by a British Ministry of Defence team tasked with future “strategic context” that the British military might face in the future. This is, at least, is the cover story for the report.

Regardless of the reason for the report, Norton-Taylor writes:

By 2035, an implantable “information chip” could be wired directly to the brain. A growing pervasiveness of information communications technology will enable states, terrorists or criminals, to mobilize “flashmobs,” challenging security forces to match this potential agility coupled with an ability to concentrate forces quickly in a small area.

Yet, if the idea of merging with the Internet is not frightening enough, consider the distinct possibility that maybe, just maybe, this technology is not meant to merely make your life easier and advance scientific discovery. Consider also that it might be more than a voluntary distraction on the level of television and video games. At least not in the long run.

As researcher and radio show host Alan Watt remarks:

It has many purposes but one of them was never to free the people, it would be used as an incredible tool of data-collection and using, like television and repetition of different topics, or the same topics or phrases again, it would be used to condition the public into their opinions, until, really, they’d be addicted to it, they could never do without it. That’s the intent, because you will go cashless eventually and it will be used as a form of social approval and disapproval, if they cut you off from the net: you won’t be able to do your banking, get money to pay your rent etc. Bertrand Russell talked about this sort of technique to be used in the future and it’s coming now. ‘Cloud’ will come in and that will take over and be THE one for the planet and everyone will rush into it thinking ‘my God I don’t have to worry about spy ware or viruses or upgrades, it’s all done for me, out there somewhere in the big “cloud.” And the Cloud, eventually, will be censoring your emails and actually popping up windows to tell you “are you sure you want to use this word, this politically incorrect word in this email?” Then it might give you a little list of fines or punishments etc. etc. This is all planned folks, that’s how you do it. Source

There is no doubt that this technology has been planned for quite a long time. Indeed, the Singularity movement has some very interesting backers. The Singularity University, a three-year-old institution that offers inter-disciplinary courses for both executives and graduate students, is hosted by NASA , a notorious front for secretive projects conducted by the government and the military-industrial complex. Not only that, but Google, which is yet another corporate front for intelligence agencies, was a founding sponsor of the University as well.

Besides the Singularity University, there is also the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence co-founded by Raymond Kurzweil, which is located in San Francisco and hosts the Singularity Summit every year. The Institute also counts among one of its “advisers” Peter Thiel, a former CEO of Paypal as well as an early investor in Facebook, a corporation whose links to the CIA are almost as plentiful as Google.

Even Bill Gates, another notorious elitist with intelligence ties, (plus a member of the lucky genes club ) has publicly praised Kurzweil as being “the best person I know at predicting the future of artificial intelligence.”

Gates’ admiration and support of Kurzweil and his projects is quite significant. And it should also raise serious questions as to why individuals such as Bill Gates would champion technologies that extend life when he, of all people, is so concerned with “overpopulation.” Would life extension technology not itself contribute to a larger population? Gates’ support makes absolutely no sense unless one understands that this technology has not been invented to extend life, at least not for the vast majority of people.

Such connections between the Singularity movement and the military-industrial complex/intelligence agencies, etc. should immediately raise concerns among the general public. Odds are, however, that they won’t.

But cashless societies and government spying are only the tip of the iceberg when one discusses the Singularity movement. The real reason for the introduction of brainchips and the merging of man with machine has more to do with eugenics than anything else.

Grossman writes as much in his article for TIME when he refers to the sessions of the Singularity Summit. Here, he mentions that these sessions “also cover the galloping progress of, among other fields, genetics and nanotechnology.” But this should come as no surprise.

Secret $1.8 Million Cryptocurrency Script

It is inevitable that “Brain-Machine Interfaces” ultimately lead back to both the Transhumanist and Eugenics movements. Putting aside the moral issues of these movements and even, for a moment, the question of whether or not choice is involved on the part of the public, the fact is that there is no desire to truly “improve” humanity. The ultimate goal of eugenicists is to create a population just smart enough to do the jobs they are assigned, but dumb enough not to question the authorities that force them to do these jobs.

The goal of the eugenicist is summed up quite well by Frederick T. Gates in The Country School of Tomorrow,where he writes:

In our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our moulding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or of science. We are not to raise up from among them authors, orators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians. Nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from them lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply.

Also, as a London School of Economics evolution proponent Oliver Curry stated, “The human race will one day split into two separate species, an attractive, intelligent ruling elite and an underclass of dim-witted, ugly goblin-like creatures.”

It is high time that those who watch the developments such as “Brain-Machine Interfacing,” “Singularity Movements,” and “Cloud Technology” with open mouths and excitement realize that this technology is not meant to enhance their quality of life or increase their fun, it is meant to control and distort them.

As the RAND Corporation itself wrote in its 2001 report, The Global Technology Revolution: Bio/Nano/Materials Trends and Their Synergies with Information Technology by 2015:

The results could astonishing. Effects may include significant improvements in human quality of life and life span . . .  continued globalization, reshuffling of wealth, cultural amalgamation or invasion with potential for increased tension and conflict, shifts in power from nation states to non-governmental organizations and individuals . . . and the possibility of human eugenics and cloning. [emphasis added]

If one were to fast forward to the future in which the Singularity movement has been successful, one might be a bit surprised as to what it would look like. Indeed, one might be surprised to see exactly how accurate the name “Singularity” actually is. Under the guise of life extension, entertainment, and even open Transhumanism, the world that exists in the future will scarcely resemble the one in which we currently live. The future — the world of the Singularity — would find a human population vastly reduced, hooked up to a central mainframe computer with no free will, no individuality, and absolutely no freedom. In the end, humanity will be reduced to the state of a mere machine with no ghost inside it.

Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Mullins, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University where he earned the Pee Dee Electric Scholar’s Award as an undergraduate. He has had numerous articles published dealing with a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, and civil liberties. He also the author of Codex Alimentarius – The End of Health Freedom 

Related Article by Brandon Turbeville:
Viruses and the “Flying Vaccine” Solution 

/* */




/* */

By Melissa Dykes

Forget underground bunkers. That’s not good enough. If Armageddon comes, it is now being posited the one percent plans to run away to Mars.

Newsweek put out an article this week claiming that the new commercial space projects by billionaires like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos are actually about an escape hatch for the wealthy elite one percent who plan to escape to Mars and leave the rest of us “to suffer on a dying, warring planet.”

The space travel companies say they are creating a way for the human species to endure by populating other planets. But the bottom line is that only the wealthy will have the means to move to Mars. Musk’s target ticket price is $500,000 a person in 2015 dollars, and that’s just to get there. Imagine the new outfits you’ll have to buy to go with that space helmet.

While it is true only the truly wealthy will be able to afford space flight with companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin, what’s funny about it is people’s responses.

Most react they are just happy to know the elite will be blasting off to another planet.

In response to the story, Matt on the Crisis Forums wrote:

I’m not so sure the world “sucks”; it just so happens to be in the hands of a tiny group of people who are doing their best to make it suck for us. I think with a few minor changes the world could actually be a really awesome place for everyone.

…to which Tazweiss responded:

If the 1% all go to Mars the rest of us might be able to create a better world here.

It’s a sad statement on society to note that people’s immediate reaction to the first commercial space flight available ever wasn’t to be bummed they can’t afford to go to Mars; it was to be excited about the fact that the wealthy elite might leave Earth en masse and go somewhere so far away, it takes roughly seven months to get there.

The comment winner goes to Farmer Sean:

“Haha!  We screwed up the Earth for the rest of you, so have fun cleaning up the mess!”

*They fly to Mars*

Secret $1.8 Million Cryptocurrency Script

“Hey, which cargo hold has the menial workers?”

“What do you mean?”

“Well, where are the people who are going to build our luxurious space palaces, grow our food and give us manicures?”

“I think….  I think we have to do all of that by ourselves.”

Best Selling Prepper and Survival Gear on Amazon (Ad)

Nah, they’ll probably promise a few “lucky” poor people free passage to Mars via a “work program” that will turn into literal slavery once they get there. Good luck escaping Mars.

Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!

/* */




/* */

By Melissa Dykes

Still think we aren’t living in the Matrix? In his fiction-turned-fact novel 1984, George Orwell wrote “Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres inside your skull.”

Apparently even that won’t hold for long.

What you are about to watch isn’t science fiction but science fact and it’s coming in the next decade or two as part of the Internet of Things smart surveillance grid they want everyone swept up into. This technology is about to openly bring us an era where government authorities can read people’s minds without their permission and use it against them including in court, for pre-crime purposes, via literal thought police who police thought crime via neurotech, and the labeling people including children as potential criminals based solely on their brainwaves…

And all of this was discussed casually at Davos this year like it’ll be a glorious brave new world instead of the Orwellian Nightmare 2.0 we all know is coming under the technocrats in charge.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhK7opcG6ao]

Each year, like Bilderberg, the elite meet at Davos for the World Economic Forum as they have since 1971 with the stated goal of being “committed to improving the state of the world” by “engaging business, political, academic, and other leaders of society to shape global, regional, and industry agendas“. The question is, shaping agendas to improve the world for who? Considering how “improved” the world obviously is since 1971, they’re really doing a bang up job over there. Listening to them talk is tough, with the smarmy “us versus them” mentality practically oozing out of every sentence. One of the biggest differences between Davos and Bilderberg is that that Davos meetings are recorded and released to the public, so they have to be a tad bit more polite about it.

Still, some of the subject matter and the way in which they discuss it is pretty horrifying. This session was called “What if your brain confesses?” It’s a panel of people laughing it up for an hour over a world where governments and the technocrats running the show will wield neuroscience tech to decode people’s brains — their inner thoughts — against their will and, in particular, the criminal justice system. It’s brought up multiple times that the Bill of Rights does not include protections for “Freedom of Thought” or the right not to incriminate one’s self based on signals their brain emits.

Thought crime, anyone?

At one point it is even mentioned that us little people have already shown how more than willing we are to give up all of our privacy for convenience, so when a portable, wearable thought-decoding mind reading device becomes available in the next decade or so, we will fall all over ourselves to wear one. In an era of omnipresent, panopticon-like government surveillance, this is the next step… snooping and monitoring not just everyone’s communications but everyone’s thoughts.

At one point, what’s coming is referred to as the “universal brain-machine interface” or “universal brain-computer interface”. Sounds like a technological hive mind, doesn’t it? Welcome to the Borg… “You will be assimilated!”

They also discuss the ability to implant false memories in our heads because our memory is like a Wikipedia page that we can edit, but so can other people… Comforting, huh? Oh, and the potential for stimulating the pain centers of the brain electronically to coerce someone to comply is brought up, work that the CIA was experimenting with back in the 1950s on record under the top secret mind control project MKUltra and which has surely progressed by now far beyond your typical idea of torture in modern times.

Secret $1.8 Million Cryptocurrency Script

Philip K. Dick and George Orwell must be spinning in their graves. Why watch a horror film when you can watch a Davos panel?

The full hour can be found here.

Also Read: Economic Elite Announce Plan to Replace Human Labor with Machines

Melissa Dykes (formerly Melton) is a co-founder of TruthstreamMedia.com. She is an experienced researcher, graphic artist and investigative journalist with a passion for liberty and a dedication to truth. Her aim is to expose the New World Order for what it is — a prison for the human soul from which we must break free.

DTOM

By Michael Snyder

Could you survive on just $2.50 a day?  According to Compassion International, approximately half of the population of the entire planet currently lives on $2.50 a day or less.  Meanwhile, those hoarding wealth at the very top of the global pyramid are rapidly becoming a lot wealthier.  Don’t get me wrong – I am a very big believer in working hard and contributing something of value to society, and those who work the hardest and contribute the most should be able to reap the rewards.  In this article I am in no way, shape or form criticizing true capitalism, because if true capitalism were actually being practiced all over the planet we would have far, far less poverty today.  Instead, our planet is dominated by a heavily socialized debt-based central banking system that systematically transfers wealth from hard working ordinary citizens to the global elite.  Those at the very top of the pyramid know that they are impoverishing everyone else, and they very much intend to keep it that way.

Let’s start with some of the hard numbers.  According to Zero Hedge, Credit Suisse had just released their yearly report on global wealth, and it shows that 45.6 percent of all the wealth in the world is controlled by just 0.7 percent of the people…

As Credit Suisse tantalizingly shows year after year, the number of people who control just shy of a majority of global net worth, or 45.6% of the roughly $255 trillion in household wealth, is declining progressively relative to the total population of the world, and in 2016 the number of people who are worth more than $1 million was just 33 million, roughly 0.7% of the world’s population of adults. On the other end of the pyramid, some 3.5 billion adults had a net worth of less than $10,000, accounting for just about $6 trillion in household wealth.

And since this is a yearly report, we can go back and see how things have changed over time.  When Zero Hedge did this, it was discovered that the wealth of those at the very top “has nearly doubled” over the past six years, and meanwhile the poor have gotten even poorer…

Incidentally, we tracked down the first Credit Suisse report we found in this series from 2010, where the total wealth of the top “layer” in the pyramid was a modest $69.2 trillion for the world’s millionaires. It has nearly doubled in the 6 years since then. Meanwhile, the world’s poorest have gotten, you got it, poorer, as those adults who were worth less than $10,000 in 2010 had a combined net worth of $8.2 trillion, a number which has since declined to $6.1 trillion in 2016 despite a half a billion increase in the sample size.