FaceApp Now Owns Access To More Than 150 Million People’s Faces And Names, And Users Are Angry
Before you download an app or a PDF, do you read the Terms and Conditions? If not, you may be unintentionally signing up for trouble, like millions of users have after agreeing to the Terms of Service of FaceApp. The viral app allows people to change facial expressions, looks, and their age. But in exchange, the company owns all the rights to the images.
Since its launch, more than 100 million people have downloaded FaceApp from Google Play. In fact, the app is now the top-ranked app on the iOS App Store in 121 countries, according to App Annie.
Based on the Terms of Service, people still own their own “user content” (read: their face). But, FaceApp also owns a never-ending and irrevocable royalty-free license to do anything they want with the photograph. That includes in front of whoever they wish.
The condition reads:
You grant FaceApp a perpetual, irrevocable, nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide, fully-paid, transferable sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, publicly perform and display your User Content and any name, username or likeness provided in connection with your User Content in all media formats and channels now known or later developed, without compensation to you. When you post or otherwise share User Content on or through our Services, you understand that your User Content and any associated information (such as your [username], location or profile photo) will be visible to the public.
Selling your face isn’t likely to cause life-altering repercussions. However, as PhoneArena’s Peter Kostadinov said, “You might end up on a billboard somewhere in Moscow, but your face will most likely end up training some AI facial-recognition algorithm.”
FaceApp isn’t the only company to collect user’s data. Facebook has been doing the same for years. As a result, we now know that the data that is collected is rarely used for assumed purposes. Furthermore, that data is not always stored securely, which can make the average individual vulnerable to hackers and identity theft.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || ).push({});
Apple is just as guilty of collecting information. Forbes reports:
Once something is uploaded to the cloud, you’ve lost control whether or not you’ve given away legal license to your content. That’s one reason why privacy-sensitive Apple is doing most of its AI work on-device.
The lesson here is that it’s smart to be wary when an app wants access and a license to your digital content and/or identify. As former Rackspace manager Rob La Gesse explained:
To make FaceApp actually work, you have to give it permissions to access your photos – ALL of them. But it also gains access to Siri and Search …. Oh, and it has access to refreshing in the background – so even when you are not using it, it is using you.
What are your thoughts? Please comment below and share this news!
IMAGE CREDIT: rawpixel
This article was sourced from Truth Theory.
Subscribe to Activist Post for truth, peace, and freedom news. Follow us on Minds, Twitter, Steemit, and SoMee.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.







August 29, 2015 at 1:33 pm |
This is not the first time a school has done this or that they have shown a drop in discipline problems. I believe there was a school in Wisconsin that did this. The question is how did they get the funding & break thru the red tape? Good job folks. I hope everything is being documented for evidence against GMOs and they get much more publicity.
August 29, 2015 at 5:19 pm |
Perhaps, if the school district invested this money in science education, they would not be wasting it on silly things. If scientific evidence was available to support that organic or non-GMO food was healthier, then it would not be illegal to make such claims on the food labels (false food labeling is prohibited by the FDA).
August 29, 2015 at 10:39 pm |
What kind of evidence do you need? For starters, there’s the multitude of data which shows the dangers of being exposed to and consuming pesticides. Organic means no pesticides. The evidence that organic foods is better is that it’s devoid of poison. What is GMO? GMO is pesticide engineered into the plant. So there we go again with the evidence we already have of pesticides and their hazards. This isn’t rocket science.
Nutritionally speaking, one food is only better than the other if it was grown in soil which was richer in minerals. Organic or non-organic has nothing to do with that.
FDA doing something illegal? This is government we’re talking about here. They make the illegal legal. Do you think they care about “legal” and “evidence”? They are gods and do as they please. Best for the school to just operate as mavericks and operate on their own.
They next thing to do is launch any Common Core education out the window.
August 30, 2015 at 4:04 am |
“What kind of evidence do you need?” – The kind of evidence that convinces the expert scientists at all the government regulatory bodies around the world that have approved these technologies as very very low risk. “Organic means no pesticides.” – No it does not. Organic farmers use lots of pesticides. They are simply restricted to using pesticides that are perceived as “natural”, like rotenone. Look up the toxicological profile of that organic insecticide. A recent Pew survey found that 88% of scientists belonging to the American Association for the Advancement of Science say that GMOs are safe. Public perception does not count as scientific evidence.
August 30, 2015 at 9:53 am |
What’s in this argument for you? Seems like you’ve been at this for a few years now:
http://ecowatch.com/2014/03/06/nyu-gmos-destroy-planet/
Why is this topic a magnet for you?
August 30, 2015 at 11:41 am |
I tend to post on subjects that I know something about. Is that strange to you?
August 30, 2015 at 11:48 am |
Not at all. What I do find strange is that when people disregard articles citing links to independent sources they stonewall it in their minds at all costs. Just an observation. No need to get defensive.
August 30, 2015 at 12:52 pm |
I put more faith in scientific articles published in scientific journals than I do in opinion pieces posted on activist web sites. Is that strange to you?
August 30, 2015 at 12:55 pm |
“articles citing links to independent source…”
Does that sound unclear to you?
August 30, 2015 at 1:18 pm |
Exactly what harm does that “independent source” document?
August 30, 2015 at 1:20 pm |
I don’t understand your grammar.
August 30, 2015 at 1:39 pm |
Ask an older friend, classmate, teacher, or one of your parents for help.
August 30, 2015 at 1:42 pm |
Personal insults now. Pretty telling. So if anyone does a search on the terms: “Rod Herman” disqus, the results are exclusively regarding GMOs. Its always a red flag when someone appears to have a single interest online.
August 30, 2015 at 1:57 pm |
I don’t know what to say when you cannot understand a simple question. I suggested you ask someone with a better grasp of the English language.
August 30, 2015 at 1:59 pm |
You should probably try to use different handles when spreading misinformation. You might be taken more seriously.
August 31, 2015 at 7:41 am |
I am an older friend to good people, a classmate, and a teacher. I am a parent. …. and I would tell most people to not trust your comments.
August 31, 2015 at 7:40 am |
You used the word “faith”. Faith implies blind obedience based not upon scientific fact.
August 31, 2015 at 4:44 pm |
LOL are you sane, the amount of fraud and corruption in those so called journals should leave you much in doubt to who funded the research and who running the journals to who is getting bribed.
August 31, 2015 at 7:39 am |
Sounds like you are posting on subjects you think you know something about.
August 31, 2015 at 7:39 am |
Good reply!
August 30, 2015 at 8:19 pm |
The evidences is out there and it’s been documented? Where? While chatting here with you in this forum, I’m not going to bother digging up all the research. If you want it, you’ll find it.
“A recent Pew survey found that 88% of scientists belonging to the
American Association for the Advancement of Science say that GMOs are
safe.”
Well, of course they did. I would too if it was my job to say such things. You know how it works with statistics. “Garbage in, garbage out!” I work in the scientific community where people daily are in the research mode of “find the cure!” These people daily wolf down GMO and don’t even understand the basic carcinogenic nature of pesticides. So much for looking to your average “scientist” to show you the way. They couldn’t research their way out of a wet paper bag.
The same goes for military types. In my exposure while in that business, we come across many who are “proud of their service” from being in Iraq and Afghanistan. All that hinges on the idea of the “official story” of 9-11. You see, their understanding of the world is dependent on B.S. Otherwise, they couldn’t live the lie. You can’t live with yourself after killing people if you knew it was murder. You have to dress it up in idea you were defending freedom. What garbage!
Many scientists believe that vaccines and GMO are safe just as many in the military believe in the official fables. If not, they wouldn’t be able to do their jobs. Realization of the truth would bring down the entire façade.
August 31, 2015 at 4:16 am |
Thank you for exposing yourself as an anti-vaxer and explaining that the same logic that leads you to reject vaccinations is used by you to reject GMOs.
August 31, 2015 at 7:44 am |
Use of the words “anti-vaxer” and “reject vaccinations” are emotional attacks intending to categorize an opponent in a negative light. They have nothing to do with logic, the scientific method, or an on-going search for the truth.
August 31, 2015 at 7:42 am |
Great arguments!
August 31, 2015 at 7:39 am |
We don’t trust you or other elitists who have historically told us the “Ozone layer will be gone by the year 2000,” or “All the world’s computers will crash in 2000 … Y2K”, or “Iraq has weapons of mass destruction,” or experts assuring us that the following are perfectly safe, DDT, Vioox, & a hundreds of other medications and substances. Only an elitist would comment “Public perception does not count…” We don’t trust FDA, the Pew survey, or the American Association for the Advancement of funding by evil psychopathic corporations. You should DAILY study math, science, logic. You should daily exercise, eat healthy, and make an effort to improve the live of at least one person. You should turn your eyes toward a search for the TRUTH instead of memorizing textbooks and getting dis-information from Controlled Media Sources.
August 31, 2015 at 9:03 am |
Exactly John. We don’t trust KNOWN LIARS. We especially don’t trust their “science”.
What we do trust, are the results WE get from eating organic non GMO foods.
August 31, 2015 at 7:21 am |
Great comments!
August 31, 2015 at 1:48 pm |
but if the NWO can’t get kids to take all day figuring out how to add 2 + 2, they might figure out how we’;re all being screwed.
August 30, 2015 at 10:46 am |
Who do the scientists work for and how much are they paid for the kind of results their employer wants?
Go watch the Russel Crowe movie -The Insider. True story of the Tobacco Industry and one of their research scientists.
August 30, 2015 at 8:21 pm |
Rod still thinks the world is run by honest people.
August 31, 2015 at 7:20 am |
People like you who use words like “Science” and “Scientific education” almost always also use emotional and unscientifically based words like “wasting” & “silly things”. You used to be billions in number. Now you are millions. Eventually you will be thousands, hundreds, then no more. We have been deceived by you and yours too many times before. Now we no longer believe you, no matter what you say. You have proven yourself
un-trustworthy. Scientific living involves observing the outcomes of actions. We have consumed organic, natural, and non-GMO foods and the outcomes are greater health, happiness, and expanded awareness. “Judge a tree by the fruit it bears.”
August 31, 2015 at 4:48 pm |
Do please continue on for you and your family have much to be admired. I don’t have the courage to put mine up being life long guini pigs for big corps. your families data 20 years from now will be a good comparisons. Thank you
August 31, 2015 at 11:01 am |
You should not spread this as news!
If things follow the usual route, the FDA will soon show up in black SUV’s, tanks, Swat, pointing AR15’s in your face, yell you to the ground, tear up and confiscate your food and any resource’s, then threaten with prison should you continue without permission before they drive away like thieves they are in the night.
They do it with natural milk farms, organic veggie stands, and anything else natural, non-GMO and healthy!
September 1, 2015 at 5:52 pm |
Monsanto will assault you – be prepared and stand firm. I would not be at all surprised that Monsanto will sue you for defamation or some other silly reason.